Organizational Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Organizational Theories - Essay ExampleResource dependence theory is based on the fact that ecesiss inevitably depend on resources and their mobility and as conduct in turn depend on suppliers of those resources (Pfeffer & Salancik, 2003). On the other hand institutional theory is based on the assertion that organizations arent particularly concerned rough task expediencies but about expediencies that arise from the strategic cultural environment of the organization, along with meeting demands put forward by lending and professional institutions. in conclusion the population ecology theory emphasizes the ways and means through which organizations structures and forms are influenced (Hannan & Freeman,1989). For example changing nature of the organization has less influence on such(prenominal) structures than the birth and death of organizations.In the ordinary sense of the word power enables those who exercise it to dominate over those who dont have it. This explanation seems to be rather simplistic though still the conventional organizational theories have a much wider acceptance in contemporary management theories. Power is a dynamic concept with a degree of fluidity and much less transparency. In other words the concept of power acquires a newer and more articulate dimension in the modern unconventional organizational theory than hitherto was known. The concept of power has many nuances including that its associated with responsibility. Thus organizational power can be extended to include incarnate responsibility as well.Resource dependence theory invariably supports these power dynamics in its articulation of a strategic supplier dominated organizational environment. moreover it must be noted here that modern writers on unconventional organizational theory tend to speculate on politicized organizational environments in send to give a revolutionary interpretation to the evolving structures and cultures. Power is rooted in the organizations dependenc e on resource providers who might not hesitate to manipulate the organizational outcomes by imposing their weight on its structures and forms. Thus power as a concept in the modern sense of the organizational context is a barometer of organizational strengths. In other words organizational power isnt a simple aggregation of individual powers as such. It has a much wider significance and impact on the organizational outcomes.The theoretical premise of power is derived from the fact that suppliers of resources have a strategic link with the organization. Therefore it is the suppliers who exercise political control over the organization (Ulrich & Barney, 1986). The authors identify and address the implications of anti-management theories within the organizational context so that a particularly significant hidden feature of the organization is brought to the surface. Notwithstanding the counter argument that organizations do not seek intentionally to politicize their operational environ ments, the resource dependence theory focuses on the link between power of resource suppliers and the conforming behavior